Thursday, June 14, 2012

Archbishop: Pass Voucher Bill Now - Or Else

From today's Phila. Inquirer.

Posted: Thu, Jun. 14, 2012, 3:00 AM
Archbishop: Pass voucher bill now - or else
When I decided in February to keep four financially distressed archdiocesan high schools open, I said that school vouchers and expanded tax credits for scholarships are urgently needed — and not just sometime in the future, but right now, during the current legislative session. If such legislation had been enacted a decade ago, the Archdiocese of Philadelphia would not have had to consider closing or consolidating elementary and high schools this year.
What I noted in February is even more pressing today: Without new scholarship tax credits and school vouchers to relieve costs, more archdiocesan schools will close soon, and more of the financial burden of educating young people will fall on the public.
I made my earlier remarks quite consciously in the presence of many of our representatives in Harrisburg, because they alone have the power to pass such legislation. While they already know my personal views on the issue, they have also heard in recent months from many of the roughly 1.4 million Catholics in the archdiocese who believe this legislation is necessary. The archdiocese's Voucher Sunday saw more than 500 of our high school students passionately advocating for their education; there were rallies at our high schools and at City Hall; and legislators received thousands of phone calls, e-mails, and letters on the subject. One thing should now be clear at the Capitol: Catholics are motivated and engaged on this issue, and they expect action.

The best bill

While a variety of relevant proposals have been floated, legislation introduced this week by State Rep. Jim Christiana (R., Beaver) is especially strong. It could create nearly 20,000 scholarships for archdiocesan schools as of September.
Christiana's bill would add $25 million in funding for the existing $75 million Educational Improvement Tax Credit program, which provides tax credits for scholarships to private schools. It would also create an Educational Improvement Scholarship Credit to fund additional "opportunity scholarships" at $100 million in 2012-13, $150 million in 2013-14, and $200 million in 2014-15. The latter would be available only to students at public schools performing in the bottom 15 percent statewide.
Funded by tax-credited contributions for designated organizations, this program would not take money away from public schools. This is of particular concern in Philadelphia and for the archdiocese, as many Catholic children attend public schools.
The bill would also help students with physical and learning disabilities by providing additional funds for their education. The archdiocese has four elementary schools providing special education and, at the high school level, the Bonaventure and Drexel programs, which address learning disabilities. We welcome the opportunity to serve even more students who can benefit from these schools and programs if this legislation passes.
The Christiana bill has many of the key components of legislation that has passed one or the other chamber of the legislature with bipartisan support. And some of the most determined opponents of school vouchers are willing to support it.

Unhappy alternative

Such support should spur immediate action in Harrisburg. But we continue to read and hear about other, more problematic pieces of legislation taking priority over Christiana's bill. I'm also keenly aware of arguments that there just isn't any money for this sort of program. My response to that is simple: Our legislators can make the right kind of investment in the future of our children now, or they can pay a lot more later for the damage done to young people by shortsighted educational policies.
Whether it's in reading, math, graduation rates, or truancy, too many schools are failing our children. And many parents, with just a little extra help, could choose better schools for their children. Maybe many of them would choose Catholic schools, where children of all races and faiths are educated, or maybe they would choose other faith-affiliated schools, nondenominational schools, or even other public schools.
Whatever their choice, they can't make it right now. As a result, too many families are resigned to substandard education.
We simply can't live with this sort of failure any longer. As many thousands of Catholics have said in a clear and collective voice in recent weeks, it's time to give all students a chance by giving parents a choice.
The Pennsylvania legislature should commit itself to significantly increasing funding for school choice immediately. Many other issues may or may not have merit, but most of them can wait another year. Our children cannot.
Inaction on the Christiana bill would be a painful dismissal of the needs and advocacy of legislators' constituents. And it would have unhappy results for everyone in our state — lawmakers and constituents alike.
Charles J. Chaput is the archbishop of Philadelphia.

15 comments:

Anonymous said...

Or Else?

Is he threating us?

Anonymous said...

"Funded by tax-credited contributions for designated organizations, this program would not take money away from public schools. This is of particular concern in Philadelphia and for the archdiocese, as many Catholic children attend public schools."

So many things wrong here it's hard to know where to start.
Where DOES the money come from?
Does he only care about the Catholic kids?
Is he really just trying to keep a steady supply of kids for his dress wearing pedophile friends?
Go away Archbishop Irrelevance.

Anonymous said...

He says the burden to fund education will fall on the public... yeah, and vouchers will have the public paying for religious schools. That's not okay in my book.

Anonymous said...

He's getting good at threats and extortion. Give us money or we're closing your catholic school. Give us vouchers (public money) or we're closing our catholic schools and dumping the kids into your public schools.

Anonymous said...

Ask any Republican: There's a clear separation of church and state. Close the Catholic schools. It will protect the young boys and put a new focus on excellence in the public schools.

Anonymous said...

MR. HARRY BLACKITT: Look at them, bloody Catholics, filling the bloody world up with bloody people they can't afford to bloody feed.

MRS. BLACKITT: What are we dear?

MR. BLACKITT: Protestant, and fiercely proud of it.

MRS. BLACKITT: Hmm. Well, why do they have so many children?

MR. BLACKITT: Because... every time they have sexual intercourse, they have to have a baby.

MRS. BLACKITT: But it's the same with us, Harry.

MR. BLACKITT: What do you mean?

MRS. BLACKITT: Well, I mean, we've got two children, and we've had sexual intercourse twice.

MR. BLACKITT: That's not the point. We could have it any time we wanted.

MRS. BLACKITT: Really?

MR. BLACKITT: Oh, yes, and, what's more, because we don't believe in all that Papist claptrap, we can take precautions.

MRS. BLACKITT: What, you mean... lock the door?

MR. BLACKITT: No, no. I mean, because we are members of the Protestant Reformed Church, which successfully challenged the autocratic power of the Papacy in the mid- sixteenth century, we can wear little rubber devices to prevent issue.

MRS. BLACKITT: What d'you mean?

MR. BLACKITT: I could, if I wanted, have sexual intercourse with you,...

MRS. BLACKITT: Oh, yes, Harry.

MR. BLACKITT: ...and, by wearing a rubber sheath over my old feller, I could insure... that, when I came off, you would not be impregnated.

MRS. BLACKITT: Ooh!

MR. BLACKITT: That's what being a Protestant's all about. That's why it's the church for me. That's why it's the church for anyone who respects the individual and the individual's right to decide for him or herself. When Martin Luther nailed his protest up to the church door in fifteen- seventeen, he may not have realised the full significance of what he was doing, but four hundred years later, thanks to him, my dear, I can wear whatever I want on my John Thomas,... [sniff] ...and, Protestantism doesn't stop at the simple condom! Oh, no! I can wear French Ticklers if I want.

MRS. BLACKITT: You what?

MR. BLACKITT: French Ticklers. Black Mambos. Crocodile Ribs. Sheaths that are designed not only to protect, but also to enhance the stimulation of sexual congress.

MRS. BLACKITT: Have you got one?

MR. BLACKITT: Have I got one? Uh, well, no, but I can go down the road any time I want and walk into Harry's and hold my head up high and say in a loud, steady voice, 'Harry, I want you to sell me a condom. In fact, today, I think I'll have a French Tickler, for I am a Protestant.'

MRS. BLACKITT: Well, why don't you?

MR. BLACKITT: But they-- Well, they cannot, 'cause their church never made the great leap out of the Middle Ages and the domination of alien episcopal supremacy.

NARRATOR #1: But, despite the attempts of Protestants to promote the idea of sex for pleasure, children continued to multiply everywhere.

Anonymous said...

That's right. It's taking away religious freedom and violates religious doctrine for Catholic institutions to have to pay for a woman's insurance to provide contraception if she so chooses, even though the money never touches the woman and the woman may not even be Catholic, but it's just fine and dandy and constitutional to give public money to promote Catholic schools because the money never touches the kids or the parents. Don't you see?

Anonymous said...

Yes, I see.The blatant hypocrisy.

Anonymous said...

Catholic hospitals reject birth control compromise
By RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR | Associated Press – 6 hrs ago

WASHINGTON (AP) — Sharpening an election-year confrontation over religious freedom and government health insurance rules, the nation's Catholic hospitals on Friday rejected President Barack Obama's compromise for providing birth control coverage to their women employees.
The Catholic Health Association was a key ally in Obama's health care overhaul, defying opposition from church bishops to help the president win approval in Congress. But the group said Friday it does not believe church-affiliated employers should have to provide birth control as a free preventive service, as the law now requires.
The hospital group's decision calls into question a compromise offered by the president himself only months ago, under which the cost of providing birth control would be covered by insurance companies and not religious employers. While churches and other places of worship are exempt from the birth control mandate, nonprofits affiliated with a religion, such as hospitals, are not.
In a letter to the federal Health and Human Services department, the hospital group said the compromise initially seemed to be "a good first step" but that examination of the details proved disappointing. The plan would be "unduly cumbersome" to carry out and "unlikely to adequately meet the religious liberty concerns" of all its members, the group said.
While some liberal-leaning religious groups see no problem with the birth control rule, Roman Catholic bishops and conservative-leaning groups are treating it as an affront and calling it an attack on religious freedom. Institutions ranging from the University of Notre Dame to Catholic Charities in several states to the Archdiocese of Washington have sued to block the rule.
With the Catholic Health Association now voicing concerns, opponents gained a powerful endorsement. There was no immediate reaction from the Obama administration.
The association represents about 600 hospitals and hundreds of nursing homes and other health-related organizations, totaling 2,000 members around the country. One of every six patients is cared for in a Catholic hospital.
In its letter, the group said the government should either broaden the exemption for religious employers, or pay directly for the birth control coverage.
Starting next Jan, 1, in most cases, women will have access to birth control at no additional charge through their job-based coverage, as part of a package of preventive services that also includes HIV screening and support for breast-feeding mothers. Some employers, considered to be "grandfathered" in under the health care law, will not have to provide the coverage.
The requirement applies to all birth control approved by the Food and Drug Administration. That includes the pill, intrauterine devices, the so-called morning-after pill, and newer forms of long-acting implantable hormonal contraceptives that are becoming widely used in the rest of the industrialized world.
The morning-after pill is particularly controversial. It has no effect if a woman is already pregnant, but many religious conservatives consider it tantamount to an abortion drug.
As recently as the 1990s, many health insurance plans didn't cover birth control. Protests, court cases, and new state laws led to dramatic changes. Today, almost all plans cover prescription contraceptives — but usually impose copays.
The White House has struggled to find a solution that will satisfy women's rights advocates without offending people who object on grounds of religious freedom. While Catholic church teaching has long opposed artificial means of birth control, polls show the faithful use the pill nonetheless.

Anonymous said...

Please. The Catholic church teaches hypocrisy by covering up their own illegal actions and by ignoring the mass of Catholics who faithfully attend Mass and still don't follow the teachings. If every "cafeteria Catholic" chose the same Sunday to stay home from Mass, the churches would be empty except for the first three pews.

Anonymous said...

I'd like to place an order from the a la carte menu:

I want your money to promote my religious schools.

Anonymous said...

But the pope just said that the priest pedophilia is a mystery. It's also a mystery how the church turned its back on all those abused children. The biggest mystery is how such a corrupt organization has managed to hold onto so much wealth and power for 2,000 years.

Anonymous said...

Alternative to vouchers: sell a painting or two.

Anonymous said...

No capital gains taxes to worry about. No taxes at all to worry about. Sell another painting to research and solve the mystery of priest pedophilia. And another to cover up the results of the research.

Can't Vouch for it said...

Philly diocese cuts 45 jobs, cites $17M deficit

Posted: Thursday, June 21, 2012 2:26 pm | Updated: 4:36 pm, Thu Jun 21, 2012.
Associated Press | 1 comment
PHILADELPHIA (AP) — The Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Philadelphia is cutting 45 jobs to address a $17 million deficit.
Archbishop Charles Chaput (SHAP'-yoo) says the budget gap is unrelated to the extraordinary legal costs incurred from criminal and civil priest-abuse cases.
The church is consolidating jobs and functions in the Archdiocesan Pastoral Center, which includes more than 40 ministry programs and offices. Chaput says the programs have run a deficit for years.
The archdiocese has also stopped publishing The Catholic Standard & Times, and moved news content to a website, http://catholicphilly.com .
The June issue is the last for the newspaper after 117 years.
The church's legal bills this fiscal year top $10 million and are climbing, based on the ongoing criminal trial of Monsignor William Lynn, the former secretary for clergy.