Saturday, May 5, 2012

Corbett Wants to Confront Pension Costs 'Tapeworm'


Corbett wants to confront pension costs 'tapeworm'

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size
Posted: Saturday, May 5, 2012 12:25 pm
HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — . Gov. Tom Corbett has added a new item to his agenda: the increasing costs of pensions covering more than 800,000 retired and current state workers and public school employees.
Aides are analyzing options to deal with the spiraling pension costs as the Republican governor surveys what could be an entire first term — and perhaps second term, too — of difficult budget-making.
"It's a big issue," Corbett said Wednesday. "I've been going to school. There are legal issues that we are taking a look at and nothing has (been) presented to me just yet, but there are approaches that may be available to be taken."
Any action won't happen until at least next year, Corbett said. But even then, legal analysts, labor union leaders and retirement system officials say they know of little that can be done to moderate the cost spike.
For one thing, reducing the benefits of retired or already hired employees — even requiring that they switch into a 401(k)-style plan — runs into a principle of state constitutional law called the "impairment of contracts" doctrine.
Plus, a November 2010 law that reduced benefits for newly hired state and school employees also deferred billions of dollars — blunting what would have been an even steeper spike — by spreading the unfunded accrued liability farther into the future.
That leaves little else that can be deferred.
Benefits for future employees could be reduced again, but that would have little effect on immediate costs.
Switching future employees into 401(k)-style plans — which Corbett supports — might save money farther down the road. But there's no guarantee of that, said Keith Brainard, the research director for the National Association of State Retirement Administrators in Essex, Conn.
In the short-term, officials and labor union leaders said, it could have the same effect as would shutting down the existing defined benefit pension plan altogether, aggravating the spike in costs because pension payments must accelerate to make up for the salary contributions that won't be coming from the new employees.
Things like finding a dedicated revenue stream or selling assets like the state liquor store system also could help, but it's inevitable that the state's costs must rise, said Jeffrey Clay, the executive director of the Public School Employees' Retirement System.
"There's no silver bullet, there's no magic potion, there's no magic wand that's going to solve this problem," Clay said.
The pension spike didn't happen overnight.
Cost-of-living adjustments, a generous pension enhancement in 2001, investment losses during the recession and the dot-com bubble, two deferments and years of underfunding by the state have led to this point. For years, retirement system officials and pension specialists within the executive and legislative branches have warned that the state faced tough choices in 2012.
Meanwhile, many employees have paid more than 6 percent or 7 percent of their salaries into the system and labor unions are wary of their employees being scapegoated.
For Corbett, who campaigned in 2010 on a pledge not to raise taxes, the problem is especially daunting. He's under bipartisan pressure to come up with more money for Pennsylvania's transportation systems, and he's taking heat for a couple of billion dollars in cuts in the current budget as well as proposed cuts to funding for public schools, universities and services for the poor, disabled and others who depend on social services.
As it stands now, the $1.1 billion that the state is paying for pension obligations this year — about 4 percent of the $27.2 billion budget — is scheduled to rise to $1.6 billion in the fiscal year beginning July 1. When Corbett campaigns for a second term as governor in 2014, he could be defending a budget that pays $3.1 billion into retirement systems.
The landscape is grimmer for the candidate who wins the 2014 gubernatorial election: Contributions are scheduled to rise to $4.3 billion just two years later.
"I equate that to a Pac-Man or a tapeworm eating up the budget," Corbett said. "I do not see the economy growing at that kind of rate and even if it did, it would just keep us even. If we do not address this pension issue now, we will be worrying about how we pay for the pensions and won't be able to pay for other needed services."
____

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Pa. Senate plans more spending than Corbett
Story
Comments
ShareShare
Print
Create a hardcopy of this page
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Wednesday, May 9, 2012 12:00 am | Updated: 6:35 am, Wed May 9, 2012.
By Gary Weckselblatt Staff Writer | 0 comments
As they did a year ago, Republicans in the state Legislature are pushing back on Gov. Tom Corbett’s cuts to education and are also looking to lessen the pain on those in need of social services.
A budget that unanimously passed the Senate Appropriations Committee on Tuesday would spend nearly $600 million more than Corbett’s $27.1 billion plan and provide an additional $245 million for higher education, $73 million more for prekindergarten through 12th-grade schooling and an $84 million boost to county governments for social services in the fiscal year that starts July 1.

“These programs are important to our commonwealth, and with the increase in revenues we can afford to fund them,” said state Sen. Stewart Greenleaf, R-12. “This is a good piece of legislation.”
The Senate took advantage of April’s uptick in tax collections and plowed more than a half-billion dollars into its spending plan.
Corbett, however, has warned lawmakers in recent weeks that any increasing revenue should not be spent as the growing cost of public employee pensions, debt service and other mandated expenses would outstrip revenue growth over the next two years.
Corbett spokesman Kevin Harley called the Senate budget proposal, which could be voted on Wednesday, “not sustainable beyond the 2012-13 fiscal year and would move the state farther away from the goal of achieving long-term structural balance.”
Greenleaf said he agrees with the governor on this point, but added “these figures may have to be adjusted up or down depending on May and June.”
A year ago Corbett proposed a $550 million cut to basic education funding in addition to the removal of $100 million for Accountability Block Grants for school districts to spend as they see fit, including pre-K or all-day kindergarten programs. He also sliced districts’ reimbursements of their Social Security payments.
Some of that money was restored; $230 million in basic ed funding, all Accountability Block Grant money and a large chunk of the Social Security portion paid by the state.
His 50 percent cut for higher education ended up as a 19 percent shortfall after some replenishment from the General Assembly.
For 2012-13, the Senate GOP plans to restore half of the $100 million “accountability” grants that helped fund full-day kindergarten, which Corbett has proposed eliminating.
It also would dismantle a proposed new block-grant program into which the governor wanted to fold public school aid with transportation and other costs. Those items would remain as separate line items under the Senate proposal, said Senate Majority Leader Dominic Pileggi.
Money for higher education includes an additional $147 million for the state-related universities — Penn State, Pittsburgh, Temple and Lincoln — and $83 million more for the 14 state-owned universities that make up the State System of Higher Education. The Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency would receive an additional $15 million.
At a recent Central Bucks Chamber of Commerce event, state Sen. Chuck McIlhinney, R-10, said “We’re hearing a lot of concern about the cuts. We’re cognizant of it.”

Anonymous said...

HELLO! HELLO! HELLO! IS THERE ANYBODY OUT THERE?

Anonymous said...

Here's some good information on our own homegrown national embarrassment

http://www.takedownfitzpatrick.com/

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/15/opinion/15sat4.html?_r=2