Saturday, May 26, 2012

Does Size Matter?

Romney sparks a debate on school class size

May 25, 2012|By Jeff Gammage and Rita Giordano, INQUIRER STAFF WRITERS
For years, teachers and parents have insisted that smaller class sizes are crucial to kids' educational success.
On Thursday, Mitt Romney visited Philadelphia and politely said they were mistaken.
And on Friday, passions erupted - among partisans and professionals, from city classrooms to City Hall to Cherry Hill.
"Out of touch with reality," Mayor Nutter fumed about the presumptive GOP nominee.
"Just plain wrong," said Steve Baker, spokesman for the New Jersey teachers union.
It's a tenet of modern American elementary and secondary education: Smaller classes produce better results. But is that accurate?
It's certain that smaller class sizes are enormously popular - not just with parents and educators, but with legislators. In recent decades, a recent Brookings Institute study found, at least 24 states have acted to require or encourage reductions in class sizes.
But here's the problem: It's expensive.
Having smaller classes means hiring more teachers and backing them with more support services. That's particularly difficult in a tough economy. Those sort of investments, in places where they've been made, have been justified by the belief that smaller classes effectively increase student learning and achievement.
In 2011, Brookings sought to examine the large body of studies on class size, and identify the most credible.
On top was the Student Teacher Achievement Ratio, or STAR, conducted in Tennessee in the late 1980s. It found that classes with 15 students achieved higher than classes with 22 - the smaller classes gaining the equivalent of three extra months of instruction.
Studies in Texas, and in the nation of Israel, found smaller gains. Other rigorous studies found mixed results in California and no effects in Florida and Connecticut.
"Conclusions have to be tentative," the Brookings study said. "But it appears that very large class-size reductions, on the order of magnitude of 7-10 fewer students per class, can have significant long-term effects on student achievement."
Teacher Aileene Halligan didn't need a study to confirm what she sees every day.
Until recently, she taught eighth-grade Spanish at Ethan Allen Elementary in Northeast Philadelphia, where her classes held as many as 38 students.
"You're praying that five kids are going to be absent each day," she said. "I couldn't get to the desks, it was so crowded. . . . Worse was the faces of the kids, looking at you like, 'Please, get to me today.' "
Now Halligan teaches ninth- and 10th-grade history at Kensington Urban Education Academy, a public high school, where most of her classes have 30 students and one has 19. The larger classes are manageable, "but it's always the smaller the better."
Why?
Field trips are easier. Donations and resources go farther. And most important, she's able to spend more time with individual students.
"To say class size doesn't matter," she said, "is a real slap in the face."
Efforts to reach Romney Pennsylvania campaign officials were unsuccessful Friday.
On Thursday, Romney visited a West Philadelphia elementary school and suggested that class size mattered little to achievement. Teachers in the room immediately, respectfully, told him he was full of soup.
Talking to a dozen or so roundtable guests at Universal Bluford Charter School, named for astronaut Guion Bluford, Romney said quality teaching and parental involvement were the keys. He recalled how, as governor of Massachusetts, he studied what does and does not boost test scores.
His staff analyzed schools in 351 cities - and found no correlation between performance and class size, he said.
"As a matter of fact, the district with the smallest classrooms, Cambridge, had students performing in the bottom 10 percent," Romney told the group. "So just getting smaller classrooms didn't seem to be the key."
He cited a study by the McKinsey Global Institute that found teacher and parent involvement mattered most.
Classes in Philadelphia public schools run as big as 33 students. Statewide, the average is 21. The national average is 20 in elementary schools and 19 in high schools, according to the federal Education Department.
From seventh grade through graduation, Romney attended the private Cranbrook Schools in Bloomfield Hills, Mich.
Classes there are small, according to statistics provided Friday by the school.
In prekindergarten, classes have 15 students, taught by two teachers and an assistant teacher. Kindergarten classes have 18 students and two teachers. Grades first to fifth are limited to 18 students per class, and grades sixth through eighth typically have 15 or 16 students. Classes in ninth through twelfth are capped at 18 students.
"Class size does matter," insisted Penny Nixon, the Philadelphia School District's chief academic officer. And it matters especially, she said, in an urban district, where students are more likely to need extra support.
It's true that research has come down on both sides, Nixon said. But in her time as a middle school teacher and principal, "the difference between 25 students in a class and 33 students in a class is huge."
So important is size that even though the district is in financial crisis - cutting $700 million from its budget over the past year, facing a $218 million shortfall next year - it's going ahead with plans to reduce class numbers in kindergarten through third grade. The goal is to have no more than 25 students in those classes.
Students had their own opinions Friday.
Outside Cherry Hill High School West, Louis Stewart, a 17-year-old junior, said he tended to think class size wasn't so important.
"I would say it has more to do with the teacher," he said. "Some teachers are more involved with their students than others. But it would be harder to do that with a larger class."
Julia Lanuez, a 16-year-old junior, said class size matters. "When it's a smaller class, it's more personalized learning and easier to meet everyone's needs."
Elsewhere in Cherry Hill, Kwame Morton, principal of the Joyce Kilmer Elementary School, cautioned that some research shows small class size alone will not yield quality results. "You have to look at lower class size along with teacher efficiency," he said.
On Friday, Nutter took part in an Obama campaign conference call to criticize Romney's views.
"I'm not sure what universe he's operating in, but we certainly know in Pennsylvania, every parent knows, every second grader knows, that smaller class sizes are preferable," the mayor said.
During the call, Erin Thesing, a first-grade teacher at Mann Elementary charter school in West Philadelphia, endorsed President Obama's education plans and described her difficulties with larger classes.
At the start of the school year, her class roster had 25 names - but 30 students showed up, forcing her to squeeze in desks, tables and chairs. Every day, parents demanded: Why must my child sit so far from the board? When will the class shrink?
Eventually her class was reduced to 21 students, "an absolute dream" that enables her to give one-on-one attention to students. And, she said, she no longer steps over chairs and boxes.
"The more personal attention I can give my students," Thesing said, "the better."

Contact staff writer Jeff Gammage at 215-854-2415, jgammage@phillynews.com, or on Twitter @JeffGammage.
Inquirer staff writer Kristen A. Graham contributed to this article.

43 comments:

Anonymous said...

Willard's privileged upbringing and elite private school education make him soooooooo in touch on this issue.

Anonymous said...

He sounds as clueless and out of touch as the Morrisville SOCs

Anonymous said...

Another Republican trying to destroy Public Education

Anonymous said...

Romney's like Hellmann but with a better pedigree.
Out of touch with anything but his own world, prone to making cruel ignorant gaffes, bad communicator, cold off-putting personality, thinks his business acumen is the cure for everything when it's not.

Anonymous said...

Romney calls for more school choice

Posted by
CNN Political Producer Rachel Streitfeld

Washington (CNN) – Calling the nation's falling educational standards "the civil rights issue of our time," on Wednesday Mitt Romney proposed dramatically expanding school choice for low-income and disabled children.

Romney told members of the Latino Coalition gathered at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce that millions of American children were "getting a third-world education," adding: "America's minority children suffer the most. This is the civil rights issue of our era."

– Follow the Ticker on Twitter: @PoliticalTicker

The GOP hopeful said low-income and disabled students should be able to choose to attend any public or charter schools in a voucher-like program, with federal aid following them to their chosen schools. The campaign also proposed allowing students to apply those federal funds toward private schools when permitted by state law, or to use funds for a tutor or digital course.

Campaign advisers told reporters the plan would not require new federal spending. They did not discuss the plan's effect on schools largely supported by that same federal aid.

In his speech Romney offered a harsh rebuke to teachers unions – suggesting those who sought to bar school choice might consider a different profession – and accused President Barack Obama of being beholden to the powerful union lobby.

"The president can't have it both ways," Romney said. "He can't be the voice of the disadvantaged public school kids and the protector of the special interests."

While he largely backed former President George W. Bush's No Child Left Behind program, Romney did call for a simpler and clearer school report card that would be accessible to parents and the community.

On Thursday, Romney will visit a charter school in Pennsylvania.

The educational policy speech is the latest in a campaign initiative to spend each week discussing a new policy issue.

The Obama re-election campaign was critical of Romney's education proposals on Wednesday. Ben LaBolt, the campaign's press secretary, said Romney's remarks were "vague" and "detail-less" on a conference call with reporters.

"In order to pay for his massive tax cuts weighted to the wealthy, Romney would have to make massive spending cuts in our schools, higher education and our job training programs," LaBolt said. "Those are not the priorities the American people want in their president."

Anonymous said...

Vouchers, tax cuts for the wealthy, public school cuts, empty promises.

The educational problems in this country will soon be over with a President Romney. Thank GOD!

Colossally and Painfully Arrogant said...

Speaking of William Hellmann, C.P.A., which one of the items below about him is NOT true?

A. Hellmann hasn’t been to a School Board meeting since his defeat in the November 8, 2011 election.

B. Hellmann recently sent a letter to the Borough indicating that he is putting his trash bill payments in an escrow account until he sees that the Borough is collecting substantial amounts of overdue trash bills.

C. Hellmann and his son, the previous and current Borough Controllers, respectively, have apparently routinely and improperly removed documents from Borough Hall.

D. Hellmann advises people to invest in Morrisville.

Anonymous said...

Let's see some proof about those Hellmann tidbits. I don't believe that he is forcing Buckman to pay his bills.

Anonymous said...

The Correct Answer is D.
A, B, C are true.

Anonymous said...

Made me remember this post from May 22, 2012

"Anonymous said...
Am I getting this correctly? I watched the council meeting last night and heard that Eric Hellman has been breaking the law (and his father before him - for years) and that when he was found out he used the borough solicitor at the taxpayers expense to try to continue to get away with his lawbreaking? Am I the only one who saw this?

This is just too good to be true."


and this one from May 4, 2012
"Anonymous said...
from a little birdie,
Oh Buckman, pay your trash, water & sewer bills! LOL now that he has so much extra free time, your very own savior is coming after YOU now Jack. So get ready to remortgage your house to pay your bills and don't blame it on the borough. You brought this on yourself.

You have more problems than open records violations and you don't even know it yet. So let this be my gift to you by way of a warning.

While you are busy protecting your administration buddies, your fav cpa has been hard at work with Jane's arm up his puppet hole, plotting away to take down people who dare to want better for Morrisville and they are going to take down people like you and Eileen with them. The best of luck to you Jack, you're going to need it."

Anonymous said...

I hope both Hellmans get jail time. We should demand it.

Anonymous said...

I am not surprised by any of this. Nothing is too low yet Hellman is above everyone, just ask him.

I had heard that he is now not paying his bills and putting his bill money into an account until (he thinks) enough money has been collected by the borough. Too funny. He didn't say what he believes "enough money" would be and that might be what gets him into trouble. Maybe we all should make up stupid reasons for not paying our bills. No doubt he will be trying to use this for some political gain when he decides to run against someone who is actually doing their job in the near future. I believe he is able to hold his money, but I also believe he is going to be charged the late fees for doing so. Idiot. That's the man to take your own money to folks - FAIL.

Jane Burger thought Hellman was her best puppet and he was for a while. What's amazing is that she couldn't see what so many of us can. She thought he was so smart but he isn't, he's just got an eye for math. Its amazing with all of her plotting she couldn't see that this man is "sideways". He doesn't think like everyone else. Ha ha Jane, you have mistaken this for genious and its just delusion. Hellman may finally get caught having been breaking the law for years and your hand is in his cookie jar as well. Love it. Just love it.

So annoying that I haven't read any of this stuff in the newspapers. Reporters asking those involved, who have obviously been deceiving the public for years, for quotes and information, like they will be honest now. Better believe if it was a Dem the reporters would be all over it, getting their info wrong and making up parts of their articles. Amazing.

Anonymous said...

Hellman is a megalomaniac

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megalomania

Jon said...

Hellman conducted school board business out of his personal business office, and has previously used the tactic of not paying and putting money in escrow (e.g. Tech School), so none is this is surprising.

Anonymous said...

Does Hellmann not have a problem with some of his dearest political allies not paying their trash bills, water bills, sewer bills, property tax bills, etc?

His elected official cronies are some of the biggest (and definitely highest profile) offenders in town. You can give a sob story or quote the bible all you want, but you really shouldn't be able to hold public office in Morrisville if you're municipal bills are deliquent.

If he doesn't care as long as they support him, that's absolutely appalling.

Anonymous said...

Does anyone know for how many years Bill Hellman was "officially" the controller for Morrisville Borough?

Just wondering how long his illegal activities as controller had gone on before his son, Eric, became the front man.

Anonymous said...

History repeats itself over and over and over and over and over and

http://savethemorrisvilleschool.blogspot.com/2008/02/more-bcct-coverage-of-hellmann-report.html

Anonymous said...

Let's all be nicey nice to everyone to their faces and ewwwww these blogs are so nasty and mean pointing out stuff. Let's all just get along. Meanwhile this sh*t goes on and on. Why is that OK? Why is it justified? You afraid these jerks will turn on you too and make your life miserable like you know they can (and do) with alarming frequency? Then you have no guts and you have sh*tty friends who really aren't friends to begin with and shouldn't be worth losing. It's the company you keep and the things you enable and condone.

Anonymous said...

Do you have any answers, John? Alina? Other than moving that is.
You can do all manner of underhanded stuff just don't blog about it?

Anonymous said...

Thank you for the link.

"League of Womens Voters Guide to the 2007 election online, and the SELF PROVIDED entry for the Emperor is:

practicing CPA who has provided accounting and consulting to many Pennsylvania Municipal Governments for the past 29 years."

Wonder if he continually broke the law with all of the many Pa Municipal Governments or only in Morrisville Borough. I REALLY hope Hellman gets charged.

Anonymous said...

If the county prosecutor isn't bringing any charges then this is all talk and worthless.

Anonymous said...

Here we go with the apologist overlookers. Charges or not, that doesn't make for a moral or ethical guy.
Plus if it was that worthless you wouldn't have felt the need to come onto this obscure blog and post something.

Anonymous said...

Words you’ll never hear from an SOC’er:

I’m sorry. I made a mistake. I was wrong. What I did was wrong.

Anonymous said...

I don't need the county prosecutor to tell me the difference between right and wrong. I don't dictate following the law and taking a legal road in life based on getting caught, by the county prosecutor or by anyone else. I really cannot follow the logic of implying that nothing wrong was done because they didn't get caught by the county. To the poster above, YOUR tax dollars were wasted and will be wasted further by the actions of Hellman & Hellman. For years, YOUR documents were illegally taken from borough hall by these ego-maniacs who think they are above the law. YOU should be mad about this, not defending it.

Anonymous said...

"Words you’ll never hear from an SOC’er:

I’m sorry. I made a mistake. I was wrong. What I did was wrong."

Agreed!

Anonymous said...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WkqgDoo_eZE

Anonymous said...

What if you lose a slander suit in court and you were your own lawyer? Then you don’t lose fair and square, it was a conspiracy? Never mind, that was all talk but it wasn't worthless. It was worth 120K to J. Gould.

Anonymous said...

there's a problem & more understanding is surfacing about the exact nature of the actual problem that's why no one is saying too much because the majority is just now realizing how where and why we are faced with the problems we have we are not unique the same problems are happening all over the nation we have power driven greed mongers that sit in higher places they control and decide what will be our future the people are getting angry and they are acting out in some places because they have finally had it surface and they know nothing can be done they are listening with their whole being not just their ears and their egos they know the truth it has reached their core we are down here and we are going to have to figure it out and we should stop fighting over the left overs and crumbs it will only get worse listen to the honest experts and strap on your battle fatigue and prepare for the final round GOT JESUS?!?He gives wisdom strength and victory to all who call out to Him thats all we need
LOVE He fills the empty with promise & abundant LIFE

Anonymous said...

Don't have a cow. Especially mine.

Anonymous said...

I'm the one who posted the prosecutor message. I think if you give one point for every good, moral, or ethical point the entire SOC group has, you would have a negative number larger than the US debt. I also stand by the idea that this is all a bunch of squawking that has no value unless theres real proof and the republican county prosecutor is willing to make a case.

Anonymous said...

If I did 85 mph down 95 and didn't get a ticket, I didn't really do it. Sweet.

Robin AKA, boy wonder said...

Holy run on sentence, Batman!

Anonymous said...

I'm not a lawyer. I don't even play one on TV. Is the County where this should go, legally?Assuming it is, I suggest taking it there. Someone in the know, because I'm sure not.I do know Hellman and his cronies play hardball, so a little hardball back is more than appropriate. Hellman abused his power as S.B. President, again no surprise that he (or Jr.) would abuse it on the Boro side also.

Anonymous said...

I have tons of sympathy for the mentally ill, but I don't necesarily want sick people holding public office.
How did we end up with so many in positions of power in Morrisville???

Anonymous said...

Observation from the parade today. The mayor tosses out a piece of candy here and there during her ride on the back of a car, around town. When she gets to her own peeps in the first ward she then breaks out the good stuff for after her trip under the train bridge. Second year in a row that I've watched this. Sounds nuts but I saw this two years in a row! The other wards aren't good enough for her secret stash of twizzlers, LOL. Its just so petty. I find this very bizarre & thought I would share. Yes, I know how stupid this post is, its just an observation and means nothing in the big scheme of things.

Jon said...

Twizzlers? No fair! Manor Park always gets the good stuff! The best candy, the best leaders, the best bars, the best gentleman's clubs, the best of everything. What are the other 3 wards, chopped liver? Come on, 1st Ward! Were they cherry or strawberry twizzlers? No, I don't even want to know, it'll just upset me more. ;-)

Jon said...

On a lighter note, the Bucks County District Attorney is David Heckler. That’s the Bucks County prosecutor, right?

Note: before Heckler was D.A., he was a Bucks County Judge. In that role, he blew off Steve Worob’s letters after a fellow Judge (Goldberg) laid down a $120,000 judgment against Worob in a slander per se suit filed by former Morrisville School District Superintendent Dr. John Gould. Yeah, it’s in the book. Both Heckler and Goldberg are Republicans. So is Worob. So is Hellmann.

What’s my point? Though a fellow Republican, Heckler didn’t do squat to help Worob. Maybe he’ll show a similar inclination towards Worob’s friend Hellmann. Er, I mean, maybe the vast conspiracy is still in place and will unfairly persecute innocent and benevolent public servant Hellmann just for kicks?

Anonymous said...

hmmm...I didn't get any. I don't live in the first ward :(

Funny Jon, made me laugh, thanks.

Anonymous said...

to the comment about the twizzlers, I also observed and was told this by several others who know this to be true as well from last year very very sad that we have come to what side of the tracks get the best candy!

Anonymous said...

Ply that Ward 1 power base with The Twist You Can't Resist.
Offer her a Baby Ruth bar (wink wink).

Anonymous said...

Dear Rita: If this is true, for God's sake, stop it. If it's not true, this is the poisoned way politics in Morrisville is viewed thanks to you and your political allies.

Anonymous said...

I observed a couple of things about the parade as well. I heard about the candy thing last year. I am not surprised by this because it's just typical of Rita Ledger.

I watched the politicians go by. The mayor on the back of a car, princess waving, tossing a single piece of candy at the people she obviously knew. Rita's borrowed car had one of those magnetic signs on it, with improper English, to let everyone know that she is the 1st woman mayor, (I believe she is actually the 2nd.) Debby Smith & Eileen Driesbach in a car with a sign on it that they had made that said borough council & their names. I saw Judge Burnes walking with Nancy Sherlock (without signs to advertise for themselves), and walking with them was a child that I know to be Mrs. Sherlock's oldest grandchild. Behind them were Dave & Janet Rivella. No sign, they could have been anyone, going along throwing out handfuls of candy to all the families, not just the ones they knew. They had Nancy Sherlock's youngest grandson with them. He was sitting between them on the back of the car, beaming from ear to ear as he & Mrs. Rivella tossed out their bucketfuls of candy. I know that the Rivellas have been doing this same thing every year long before Mr. Rivella became a councilperson. Such a difference in all of these people.

I observed something else. I saw the two Morrisville police officers who are married and their children at the parade. The parents looked like they were on duty (with their children). I really hope this was not the case, but I'm pretty sure it was. I even saw the kids in the police car. My first thought was that there is so much wrong with the parents having their kids with them while they are on duty. Then I realized that the husband and wife were on duty at the same time, which seems wrong as well. This is something that really should be looked into by the borough.

Jon said...

From 6/3/12 Phila. Inquirer.

Class size does make difference

Inquirer Editorial

It was no surprise that educators at a West Philadelphia charter school challenged Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney’s statement that class size has no impact on student achievement.

His assertion isn’t supported by most research, and it is the widely held belief of generations of parents and teachers that class size matters when it comes to learning.

Many schools — including the private academy where Romney sends his children, which advertises an average class size of 12 students — have long touted small class sizes as a selling point. In fact, legislators in at least two dozen states have enacted laws mandating or encouraging small classes.

A 2011 review by the Brookings Institution of the large body of studies on class sizes said the conclusions, while tentative, do suggest that having fewer students in class "can have significant long-term effects on student achievement."

A definitive study on the subject, the Student Teacher Achievement Ratio, conducted in Tennessee in the late 1980s, found that classes with 15 students achieved more than classes with 22 — with the smaller classes gaining the equivalent of three extra months of instruction.

It is worth nothing that a study by the McKinsey & Co. global management consulting firm found that students in some developed countries were not helped by smaller classes.

But studies or not, virtually any teacher in the United States will tell you that a smaller class size is their preference. Fewer students better enables them to provide one-on-one attention, especially to those children with the greatest educational needs — among them the poor, English language learners, and special education students.

Nowhere is the impact of smaller class sizes felt more than in urban schools, where overcrowding and violence can impact learning. Some classes in the Philadelphia public schools have as many as 33 students. That’s too many. Statewide, the average is 21. The national average is 20 in elementary schools and 19 in high schools, according to federal data.

Despite a projected $218 million budget shortfall, the Philadelphia School District plans to proceed with plans to reduce its kindergarten through third-grade classrooms to no more than 25 students in each class.

Smaller classes require more teachers and costs more money. But the move makes sense in Philadelphia, where nearly half of the students cannot meet reading and math benchmarks. They need the extra attention gained with smaller classes.

Sadly, if Gov. Corbett doesn’t increase funding for public education, smaller class sizes will increasingly become an expensive investment that many districts won’t be able to afford.

Fixing the public schools and improving student performance is more complicated, of course, than simply having smaller classes. There are other factors that yield good results, including putting the best teachers in the classrooms with a strong curriculum and safe schools.

But keeping classes small should be a priority. They are a vital part of the lesson plan for students to succeed.